> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
>
> Ed delicately pointed out that I missed the point when I said;
>
> > >>Certainly those users didn't accidentally pull up view instead of
> > >>browse.
> > >
> > >Actually they probably did.
> > >
> >
> > Re-read the original post, Chris. The users ran up against the
> > artificial storage limit the OP placed into the ISPF
> configuration. If
> > this had simply been VIEW vs BROWSE, they would have just
> changed to
> > BROWSE and moved on. Instead, they went to considerable
> effort to get
> > around the restriction. They discovered and exploited a "hole" in
> ISPF's
> > limit checking that allows them to EDIT a small file and
> then copy in
> > the "large" one they *really* want to EDIT. Sounds to me like they
> > deserve a raise! :-)
>
> Um. Yes. You're right of course. Maybe they do need a raise!
> Or maybe I need another week off. Perhaps two.
Going to Wyoming in a couple weeks. You're welcome to come out and run the
camcorder as we run up & down the mountains near Yellowstone for a week.
:-)
-jc-
>
> CC
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
> instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at
> http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
