Correct. And in this case since it is pointing to IEFRDER, I think that is what the problem is.
Ted, regarding your "ignored" statement: This has been discussed at various times on this list. That "trick" is often used with SYSUDUMP. For example: //* NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING, SEEMINGLY DUPLICATE LINES, //* ARE NOT IN ERROR. THEY ASSURE THAT MULTIPLE DUMPS //* WILL BE INDIVIDUALLY RELEASED TO JES. //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*,FREE=CLOSE //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*,FREE=CLOSE //SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*,FREE=CLOSE -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:mzel...@flash.net Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:24:36 -0400, Scott Rowe <scott.r...@joann.com> wrote: >Actually, IIRC, they are not really ignored - they simply don't cause an error. They wind up in the TIOT, with all the proper resources allocated - but they are very difficult to use. > >>>> Ted MacNEIL <eamacn...@yahoo.ca> 3/29/2010 12:19 PM >>> >>But why do you have 2 HASPLIST DDs? > >Except for confusion, I thought the second, and subsequent (if any), DD's with duplicate names were ignored. >- >Too busy driving to stop for gas! > >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
