-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Cobol vs Java - who is faster?

Norman Hollander writes:
>Specialty Engines don't exist for performance reasons. They exist
>to defer General Purpose Engine upgrades which WILL increase
>software licensing charges.

First of all, general purpose engine upgrades don't increase software
licensing charges unless you're talking about software licenses tied to
machine capacity (i.e. full capacity licensing). You can add as many CPs
as
you want, but what you pay for sub-capacity licensed software depends on
whether you use the CP capacity or not (and on a sustained basis, i.e.
peak
four hour rolling average). I'm not trying to be pedantic. It's a very
important distinction.


What about 3rd party software. Every time we increase MSU/MIPS we get
nailed from third party vendors. I can't wait to see what IBM is
announcing that insinuates that we won't need third part vendors
anymore.



Moreover, if you're also upgrading models, that could lower your
software
charges.

And software licensing charges better not be the sole criterion for your
business's success or failure, otherwise you're really in trouble. (Some
businesses are!) Software you license is software you don't have to
write
yourself (or software that would otherwise be unwritten or un-run). And
spending more on such software is often the best idea in the world,
because
it means (for example) you've eliminated a paper-based process that's
costing your business an incredible fortune every month, not to mention
lost marketshare. Software is great stuff, and I buy and use a lot of it
because it helps me get my job done better. And every computer would be
an
expensive doorstop without good software.

Anyway, with all that out of the way, in the engineering sense I suppose
you could argue that specialty engines do not provide "performance," as
long as you're also willing to argue that additional CPs don't provide
performance either. However, in the real world, I think they do: or at
least price-performance. That's because you've implicitly assumed equal
response time service delivery pre- and post-specialty engine
installation.
To the end user, at least, the specialty engine provides "performance"
because their response times improve as they get more CPU resource for
their particular workloads, post-speciality engine.

I've heard people argue that speciality engines are not "accelerators,"
so
don't use that word. Well, OK, in the pure engineering sense maybe they
have a point. But how about the end user's point of view? She gets
better
response time because her workload has less contention and more capacity
available. Her work is accelerated.

So if end users (among others) want to use words like "performance" and
"accelerator" to describe speciality engines, why not? It works for me,
and
I'm not going to be so pedantic about that.

Speaking only for myself, as always.

- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect
STG Value Creation & Complex Deals Team
IBM Growth Markets (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

==========================
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity
to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please 
notify the system manager. This message
contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual 
named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the 
sender immediately by e-mail if you
have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. 
If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to