John P Kalinich wrote:
I would not worry about FUD given the following statement from the article.
"Some companies still employ an older mainframe with a screen known as a
3270 terminal emulator, which evokes the decades-old Disk Operating System,
or DOS, that predated Microsoft (MSFT) Windows"
Yeah, so, do we have a responsiblity to point up the error
of such careless reporting? Is it in our (mainframer's)
best interest to send emails decrying the sloppy reporting?
Do we let the myth continue?
From: Ken Porowski <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 08/03/2010 09:31 AM
Subject: More FUD on the demise of the Mainframe
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2010/tc2010082_274669.htm
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com
* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
+ Training your people is an excellent investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
