Hi
I understand "not so simple", but the problem is why not , at last in
processor level
If you compare the effort to get a unique key with the large number of
new, sometimes "exotic" , machine instructions
you can ask Why it is so. Why don't get a counter from the CPU or with
some simple system call ?
On 9/7/2010 10:29 PM, john gilmore wrote:
The OP asked for a perhaps SYSPLEX-wide facility. The CF-based approach I
suggested is probably a minimal way to meet this requirement.
For those of you who have not looked at such problems in any detail itr is
perhaps appropriate to recall that SYSPLEX-wide data sharing poses significant,
non-trivial problems.
It is not neurosurgery, but It certainly cannot be done in COBOL, which,
whatever its other merits, is not a systems-implementation language.
You must write authorized code; and you need the appropriate design and testing
skills, as I made clear in my original post. If you don't have them you should
think about getting an ISV who does to do the job for you.
John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives athttp://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
