Yes, MCS, ty. Also, IBM just got back to me and they highly recommend that they be in the same CSI.
So now the question arises, it is better to reinstall the products or just merge the CSI's via EXPORT, IMPORT, etc? On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com>wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:30:01 -0400, George Henke wrote: > > >Currently we have OMEGAMON and OMEGAVIEW in separate CSI's. > > > >Recently we applied a PTF to resolve an OC4 to OMEGAMON but the same PTF > >also needed to be applied to OMEGAVIEW and was not. > > > >There are those who think had they been in the same CSI this problem would > >not have occurred. > > > >If they are separate FMID's and even if in the same CSI and sharing the > same > >GLOBAL ZONE and PTS, and maybe even the same TARGET ZONE, I question > whether > >the PTF would have co-req'ed across FMID's. > > > Corequisites are commonly used across FMIDs within the same > TARGET (or DLIB) zone. That may even be the most frequent > use. > > There are restrictions on applying a PTF to two different > FMIDs in the same APPLY step, regardless that the PTF > contains the needed ++VER statement. > > >But I guess that all depends on the UCL in the PTF. > > > ITYM MCS. > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- George Henke (C) 845 401 5614 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
