On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:14:38 -0600, McKown, John
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I do understand that you want to use TMM. However, in this specific case,
why not just COPYDUMP from the old ATL to the new ATL without using TMM? I
would guess that you will need to do any dataset stacking from the old
volumes onto the new volumes "by hand". I'd likely do this in a single step
with UNIT=AFF and VOL=REF= in the JCL so that there will only be a single
mount of the new tape volume. I don't know how many volumes you have which
would be a definate impact on how hard it would be to actually do. Your tape
catalog may help because it should have the block count on the existing
COPYDUMP tapes so that you can get a decent estimate of how to stack them
onto the higher capacity 3592 tapes.
>
>I know it's not what you want to do, but it may be better than doing a
bunch of RESTORE and reDUMPs.
>

Yes, that sounds like a better approach than RESTORE and DUMP. We'll give it
a whirl. Thanks John.

Regards, Fred

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to