Is that not why the world has shifted from having one vp, director, manager, supervisor....... to 'save' money and have a million paper pushers ??.
Jim Thomas -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 1:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: AC (authorization code) change In <[email protected]>, on 04/12/2011 at 06:40 PM, john gilmore <[email protected]> said: >What you judge prudential seems to me to be bureaucratic complication >that provides the inexperienced with the illusion of security without >its substance; and you view my suggestion as irresponsible. Refusing to allow a novice to update an authorized library is hardly a bureaucratic complication. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
