In <4da4b490.7030...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 04/12/2011
   at 10:22 PM, "R.S." <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> said:

>So, IBM simply closed way for "independent vendor" blades.

No.

>What does it mean???

Management covers a multitude of sins. 

>Yes, centralized management could be a value added, but it's  NOT
>crucial for the application. 

Lots of things are not crucial for the application but still add
enough value to be worth the expense.

>Couldn't ISAO live without such management?

Il va sans dire. But that's not the relevant question.

>I strongly doubt.

No doubt, but that conveys no information.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to