In <4da4b490.7030...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 04/12/2011 at 10:22 PM, "R.S." <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> said:
>So, IBM simply closed way for "independent vendor" blades. No. >What does it mean??? Management covers a multitude of sins. >Yes, centralized management could be a value added, but it's NOT >crucial for the application. Lots of things are not crucial for the application but still add enough value to be worth the expense. >Couldn't ISAO live without such management? Il va sans dire. But that's not the relevant question. >I strongly doubt. No doubt, but that conveys no information. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html