Jags As I have just pointed out in the RACF-L list, when you post in more than one list you should say so in order that people can respond appropriately.
> ... apology for posting this question in this forum, ... Unless there is a list specifically for matters concerning SDSF, this list will be the appropriate one - and *not* RACF-L. If the folk in RACF-L see that you have posted here they will know they need not bother dealing with a matter outside their formally defined zone of expertise since the question has been posed where it should be being posed. - Incidentally, if we are dealing with something which you think should work but doesn't, we are dealing with a *problem*, not an *issue*. As you can see above, because of this wanton misuse of the word "issue", it is now impossible actually to use the word in contexts where it would most naturally be used and another word must be substituted. In the case above, I felt obliged to back-key, as it were, over "issues" and key "matters" or I would inappropriately be stating that the lists are only for "problems", incorrectly described as "issues", when lists are indeed for "issues", in the original sense of the word before its attempted corruption, as well as "problems". I can now imagine some of limited intellect - it's a family list so I am guarding my language - jumping in with totally useless comments that "language evolves" and the like. To which my response - so don't bother posting - is not when it involves losing "species", we are already too deeply into "The Sixth Extinction" without deliberately adding any more loss. Chris Mason On Tue, 17 May 2011 14:28:01 +0530, jagadishan perumal <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >Recently we have upgraded our z/os to V1R12 but still we are not able to >access the SDSF options and below error message is thrown. > >ISF024I USER A255209 NOT AUTHORIZED TO SDSF, NO GROUP ASSIGNMENT >*** > >From the racf point of view i have checked the profiles permission but still >we are not able to invoke. Is it something can someone throw light on this >issue. apology for posting this question in this forum, but i just suspected >whether it has any issues with exit routines. > > >Regards, >Jags ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
