In <[email protected]>, on 06/11/2011
at 10:45 PM, William Donzelli <[email protected]> said:
>Picky question - can I assume that there should be an S prefixing the
>document number, as in S121-0545-3?
Yes, but the assumption might be in error. Check the date. Was it
before IBM introduced the G, L, S and Z prefixes?
>Did IBM just forget the S when typesetting?
I doubt it.
>Is there significance to the missing S?
Is there a missing S at all? My recollection is that the 2540 is old
enough for the prefixes to not have yet existed.
>I need to know where to file it!
Well, my filing system is to ignore the prefix and sort on xxx-yyyy.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
