willie bunter wrote: >I went back as far as July 01 SMF records and nothing showed despite searching >for records 14 15 17 18 61 62 63 64 65 67 68 136 & 139
No RACF SMF records? Hmmm? I hope you have really LOGOPTIONS=ALWAYS for dataset RACF class... Are *all* your SMF processes running 100% fine with no loss of records at all? Why SMF record type 138 and 139? What product is generating them? Or it was deleted / renamed / moved from another LPAR? Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
