>From one of the older threads, I thought IEBCOPY was not linked as AC(1) but the 'older' iebcopy still was and is supposed to have been renamed to IEBCOPYO or so...
Kind Regards Jim Thomas 617-233-4130 (mobile) 636-294-1014 (res) j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email) -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 12:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: 1.13, IEBCOPY, and APF In <9774586403039933.wa.m42tomibmmainyahoo....@bama.ua.edu>, on 07/15/2011 at 12:20 PM, Tom Marchant <m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com> said: >No. AC=1 in SYS1.LINKLIB. The old one was, but are you saying that the new (z/OS 1.13) IEBCOPY is still AC(1)? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1516/3770 - Release Date: 07/17/11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
