The is nothing about MVCL that violates refresh/reuse -ability. Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State University
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Micheal Butz > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 12:10 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: SYNCH[X] vs LINK[X] > > In a earlier post John Gilmore wrote as long as the copy is > refershable reusable the Info is kept in the CDE > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Postpischil <gerh...@valley.net> > wrote: > > > On 8/23/2011 1:05 PM, Micheal Butz wrote: > >> If I have a peice of code that was MVCL somewere it can'nt be > >> the object of synch/synch > > > > OK, I'll bite - why not? > > > > Gerhard Postpischil > > Bradford, VT > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN > INFO > > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
