For PROCs it's NOT hit or miss. If a PROC is invoked it's reported it the step record.
That was, by my understanding, at least part of the original request. For regular DSNs it is hit or miss -- depending on whether the member is specified or not. The rest is problematic. - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca Twitter: @TedMacNEIL -----Original Message----- From: Greg Shirey <wgshi...@benekeith.com> Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:41:08 To: <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> Subject: Re: Last use date of a PDS member I did mention SMF records. I'm not sure what you mean - are you disagreeing that it's hit or miss? I'm suggesting that you can search through SMF history and maybe you'll find when the proc was last invoked, but maybe you won't. It just depends on how much history you keep. Doesn't it? Greg -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:25 PM >Thanks, and I appreciate all the responses. What I take away from them is >that A) there are 3rd party products that can track member usage, or B) each >shop can craft its own solution, which may consist of SMF records or some >other home-grown function. >But without either A or B already in place it's >hit or miss. Not in all cases. As I stated PROCs invoked can be determined from SMF step records. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
