On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:54:45 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:

>I think that you answered your own question.
>
>"aside from not recovering the
>victim(s) of a ++DELETE command?"
>
>I could never understand why that is the case. RESTORE should restore 
>everything.
> 
Yup.  There's another one that's about as bad.  When link edit JCLIN
adds an INCLUDE statement, the load module is not necessarily
relinked to add the MOD element mentioned.  I know; this behavior
is documented fully, even tediously.  That doesn't alter the fact that
the design is wrong.  The resource spent on adding emphasis to the
description of a deficiency would better have been used to repair it.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to