Sorry, I forgot: many PL/1 users in Switzerland, too.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 18.01.2012 00:53, schrieb Bernd Oppolzer:
We are a big insurance company in Germany, and we do PL/1 until today.
We also do ASM and C, but no COBOL - never.
I heard some years ago that only about 5 % of the mainframe programs
are PL/1,
compared to 80 % COBOL. Don't know, if the numbers are correct. Most PL/1
users are in southern Germany (where we are) and Japan.
I also heard that we in Germany (or Europe) spell it PL/1, but in the
other
places it's called PL/I.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 18.01.2012 00:22, schrieb Roberts, John J:
I was a PL/I developer around 1972. I loved it with BASED variables
and STRING types. But up in Canada it really fell out of favor after
about 1975. A lot of people were trying to do apps that were pretty
marginal on the 370/158's of the day. So a lot of customers did
COBOL or ASM, not PL/I. PL/I was reputed to have a 30% disadvantage
compared to PL/I. My old employer the Bank of Montreal did its
retail banking system in CICS/ASM and its Mortgage system in COBOL.
When I visited the IBM Hursley Lab in 1976 I was told that PL/I had
only really caught on in Europe.
No doubt once they got past the "F" compiler and onto the many
Optimizing Compilers things must have improved. I wonder if there is
a present-day benchmark comparison?
Also, is it PL/1 or PL/I?
John
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
