Right you are, Chris, Ted's last post to IBM-MAIN was indeed Dec 30.  However, 
when I tried to locate it in the Google Groups version of the list, Ted's 
"profile" 
 did not include it.  

 > Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:38:02 -0500
> From: jayare...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: Hands up! (Was: CPP (C++) file on z/OS)
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> 
> No, the post I had in mind was 
> 
>  
> http://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main/tree/browse_frm/thread/37b96e67a712a429/fa36e99827151c83?rnum=21&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fbit.listserv.ibm-main%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F37b96e67a712a429%3Fscoring%3Dd%26&scoring=d#doc_99ee584950b96736
>     (mind the rap)  
>  
> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
> From: 
> eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL)
> Date: 
> 2 Dec 2011 02:23:28 -0800
> Local: 
> Fri, Dec 2 2011 5:23 am 
> Subject: 
> Re: Last use date of a PDS member
> "Mea culpa., I must be having major memory problems. I was totally wrong on 
> finding the PROC  name in type 30. 
> yet snother senior moment, and I know a retrsction is not 
> necessaruly good enough. 
> I'm gone from this list due to my failing memory "  
> 
> And, yes, "last post" would be appropriate.  
>  > Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:36:53 -0600
> > From: chrisma...@belgacom.net
> > Subject: Re: Hands up! (Was: CPP (C++) file on z/OS)
> > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> > 
> > jayrelim
> > 
> > > Based on ... (2) not having seen him post lately,
> > 
> > Last post - appropriate? - on IBM-MAIN is dated 30 Dec last year:
> > 
> > Subject: Re: IBM Manuals
> > From: Ted MacNEIL <eamacn...@yahoo.ca>
> > Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
> > Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:59:26 +0000
> > 
> > But I have evidence that he posted in the RACF-L list today!:
> > 
> > Date:         Wed, 1 Feb 2012 01:23:42 +0000
> > Reply-To:     eamacn...@yahoo.ca
> > Sender:       RACF Discussion List <rac...@listserv.uga.edu>
> > From:         Ted MacNeil <eamacn...@yahoo.ca>
> > Subject:      Re: IRRUT200 performance question.
> > 
> > -
> > 
> > > Based on (1) a comment I seem to recall him making a while ago ...
> > 
> > Is this the post you have in mind?:
> > 
> > Subject: Re: z/OS UNIX file can't be deleted. (Was confusing and confused)
> > From: Ted MacNEIL <eamacn...@yahoo.ca>
> > Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
> > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:34:27 +0000
> > 
> > It contains a self-denying ordinance:
> > 
> > <quote>
> > 
> > But, I shall not be responding to any more bump on USS.
> > 
> > </quote>
> > 
> > He probably meant "bumpf" but I guess the spittle obscured his screen - or 
> > made his keyboard a bit slippery in places!
> > 
> > This post is actually worth reading in full in order to see why the brigade 
> > deserves its name.
> > 
> > Incidentally, just like the original self-denying ordinance of 1644/1645, 
> > it became famous for not being observed!
> > 
> > Subject: USS
> > From: Ted MacNEIL <eamacn...@yahoo.ca>
> > Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:44:06 +0000
> > 
> > To add insult to his self-inflicted injury, he even *initiated* this thread.
> > 
> > Probably some post provoked him but he was trembling so much with rage he 
> > forgot to indicate what it was!
> > 
> > Finally, the foundations upon which he bases his brigade headquarters, 
> > namely that I have no authority to make my claims, are very easily 
> > demolished with the following reference, one of many obviously:
> > 
> > <quote>
> > 
> > As part of the name change of OS/390 OpenEdition to OS/390 UNIX System 
> > Services, occurrences of OS/390 OpenEdition have been changed to OS/390 
> > UNIX System Services or its abbreviated name, OS/390 UNIX.
> > 
> > </quote>
> > 
> > http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA1E211/CHANGES
> > 
> > and search for "OpenEdition".
> > 
> > Naturally "OS/390" can be understood to be replaced with "z/OS" today. I 
> > don't suppose even the brigadier would be so stupid as to argue with that.
> > 
> > Chris Mason
> > 
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:06:46 -0500, J R <jayare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >"Brig. MacNeil"  
> > >
> > >Based on (1) a comment I seem to recall him making a while ago and (2) not 
> > >having seen him post lately, 
> > >maybe that should be "Brig. MacNeil (Ret.)"
                                          
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to