Hi
Anyhow are you sure the LE environment creation is the overhead ?
I mean maybe the program load/delete can be also a problem .
With the LE RUNTIME options , STACK HEAP allocation also you can
increase the performance, but it would be not bad to see
there is the problem, before do something .
On 2/3/2012 12:04 PM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
I have a C program that is called intensively more then 10 times per
second. As it runs under LE, it requires LE to re-create the language
execution environment which is a huge overhead for a small and short
running program. I want to eliminate LE to get involved. I thought that
static bind will cause the LE stub program to branch instead of load q link
to LE callable services. What should i do, compiler wise in order to
eliminate LE to interfere? the compiler option TARGET(IMS,CURRENT) instead
of (TARGET(LE,CURRENT) may help, but there is no IMS involved and I can't
expect the results (I ma not the one who compiles the program).
I hop I explained my problem ... Will be happy to get your advice on this.
ITschak
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
