To Whom It May Concern:
I think you are probably talking about "code quality", and, if it refers to
COBOL source modules, there is a product on the market designed specifically to
help manage the accuracy of that environment. And, for the automatic creation
of test data, there is also a product that can automatically generate test
data, files and tables that in full respect of the referential integrity
provide for accurate testing in the shortest time, meaning more test sessions.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
-----Original Message-----
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net>
To: IBM-MAIN <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu>
Sent: Sun, Feb 12, 2012 8:00 am
Subject: Re: What QA tools do you use for testing?
In <4f357b29.9020...@consolidated.net>, on 02/10/2012
at 02:16 PM, Dave Day <david...@consolidated.net> said:
> I'd like to improve the quality of my code, before it goes out
the door. Sometimes, some really stupid coding errors make it past
my own testing. If your are writing the code, and then testing it
yourself, you're kind of in a tunnel-vision scenario.
The best tools, IMHO, are
1. Code/design reviews
2. A thorough test suite. The hard part is not the driver for the
test, but coming up with the actual test data to cover all
code paths.
-
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
e don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
or IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
end email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
