I have a lot of experience designing commercially successful products that
ran with one foot on the mainframe and one foot on a little white box.

Can you say (without divulging that which you are not willing to divulge)
what in broad strokes the product is going to accomplish?

Your 1. is a technique that was common in the early days of PC-mainframe
integration. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_scraping#Screen_scraping . I
think "screen scraping" has kind of fallen into disrepute.

Your 2. sounds like a solution to a different problem than 1. Using FTP with
no exits you can build JCL and data files, submit the JCL as a mainframe
job, wait for it to complete, and bring back both the system messages and
the output files. If that does the job for you, it's a lot of work getting
it "perfect" but it's a very valid technique.

Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Ed Mackmahon
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Interfacing with the MainFrame

Hi 

How would you prefer a product running on a server outside the mainframe
will interface with the mainframe?

Some Ideas i had:

1. Using a macro emulator that simulate a user which logon as a regular 
     user, snap shot the screen display and parse the results on the open.

2. Using FTP exits in order to submit a job / moving a rexx to be ran under
AXR etc...

    will this be a problem in your organization?


Any other ideas would be appreciated...

Thanks
Ed

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to