On 8 April 2012 13:43, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> wrote:

> o While many UNIX-like systems provide a definition of PATH_MAX
>  in /usr/include/limits.h, POSIX deprecates this, and USS does not
>  provide one.  IBM gives the rationale that the limit is filesystem-
>  dependent and code relying on it might become obsoleted by
>  new technology.

I'm just curious about these many UNIX-like, presumably non-POSIX,
systems. There's Linux (or GNU Linux, if you prefer), but what are the
others?

> o A very deep path can cause "rm -rf" to fail in violation of POSIX
>  spec with a "too many open files" error.

What has IBM's response been? Surely if they are POSIX/UNIX branded,
they must comply.

Tony H.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to