I'm not sure, but, yes I think so.

2006/1/18, Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Are you using any SMF exits such as IEFU29?
>
> Don Imbriale
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf
> >Of Víctor de la Fuente
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:39 PM
> >To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> >Subject: Re: How SMFDUMP works?
> >
> >Hi!
> >I readed quickly all your answers!Thanks to all!
> >My problem with the CLOSE PENDING is the file is not going DUMP REQUIRED
> >forever...until it wants! I mean we don't know when it is going to change
> >its status. Sometimes we waited for 20 minutes or more!!!!! So we need to
> >know why it's not changing, because we'll go out of buffers if, any funny
> >day, the file wants to stay in CLOSE PENDING for hours!
> >
> >Talking about SMF type records, we currently are NOT writing Type 19, 69
> nor
> >99. When I can, I'll send you our SMFPRM member.
> >
> >I don't know the solution for my problem yet, but, this way, I'm sure
> I'll
> >be a SMF expert in a few days!!!
>
>
> ***********************************************************************
> Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
> offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
> account or account activity contained in this communication.
> ***********************************************************************
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to