In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/10/2006 at 10:07 AM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>in the initial translation from "real-storage" MVT operating system, >to VS2-SVS ... single virtual storage, a single 16mbyte virtual >address space was created and some paging code was hacked onto the >side of MVT ... and ccw translation routine from CP67 (CCWTRANS) was >glued into MVT. In effect, for most of MVT, it was as if it was >running on 16mbyte real machine (and there was little awareness that >it was running in a virtual machine environment. There were several things that made it visible. 1. TSO swapping 2. The presence of *all* SVC modules in the address space. 3. The (unfortunate, IMHO) ABEND S0C4 that did *not* indicate a PI type 4. >The real machine might have 4mbytes of real storage, Ours only had 2 MiB. >The real machine might have 4mbytes of real storage, but there was a >total of 16mbytes of virtual storage defined. More if you took TSO into account. >3081 and 370-xa introduced 31-bit (virtual) addressing and also >generalized the duall-address space support with "access registers" >and "program call". No. PC came in with the 303x, prior to XA, and access registers came in with the 3090, later than XA and part of ESA. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html