In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
03/28/2006
at 03:28 PM, Jorge Arueira Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Issuing a wait macro in a CICS transaction, in the main task, is
>forbidden. Why no have a protection for not down the CICS ???
It would be expensive to enforce the various rules that a transaction
should follow. However, usually issuing a WAIT will only cause
performance problems.
>Is necessary open a call in support IBM for this problem ???
Only if it's an IBM product issuing the WAIT. Also, keep in mind that
this applies only to a WAIT in the CICS main task. The current CICS
has support for a transaction to request execution in a subtask.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
