I may be wrong but I thought that DSORG
was not optional on the DCB macro.
From: Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:40:33 -0600
In a recent note, J R said:
> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:24:54 -0400
>
> Your inclinations assume that:
> (a) DCBDSORG will change during OPEN, and
>
> I don't believe (a) ever happens.
>
I certainly did assume that. Have I misunderstood the
following:
Title: z/OS V1R5.0 DFSMS: Using Data Sets
Document Number: SC26-7410-03
# 3.2.2.1 "z/OS V1R5.0 DFSMS: Using Data Sets"
3.2.2.1 Filling in the DCB
4. From the JFCB, OPEN fills in any field not completed in the DCB or
DCBE. This completes what is called the forward merge.
??? (I know, it's pretty complicated.)
> >From: Paul Gilmartin <[log in to unmask]>
> >Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:35:55 -0600
> >
> >My inclination would be to verify:
> >
> >o DSORG != PO in the DCB after OPEN.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
