On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:35:18 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <shmuel+ibm- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... >No, you just didn't think it through. The Devil is in the details. >... >The entire node is a chunk of code. There is no node type for the >hardware itself. >... Well, you're the one with the FAP; I can only argue from what I remember, and that memory is over 15 years old. My recolection is that node type wasn't code at all; that it was a description of the hardware that exwecuted the code. (About the only thing in SNA that acknowledged the existance of hardware.) I know that's how I interpretted it when I wrote a brief tutorial on SNA for the company I was leaving. It won't be the first time I've been wrong for over 15 years. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
