One thing a co-worker found out a few years ago before I was here. You better put a cap on the amount of ESTOR that can be used for Hiperbatch!
Which brings up a good point. If z/OS 1.x and running on in 64bit mode, can one use Hiperbatch? Doesn't Hiperbatch require Estor? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/2/2006 3:47:25 PM >>> Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote: [...] > Finally, if the datasets is 4-5GB and you want to have a ton of jobs read it > as fast as possible, then on HDS storage consider putting the file in > FlashAccess if you have HDS Arrays. This is functionally the same as Solid > State Disk (remember those), and it won't matter what sort of disk and > parity scheme you are using. Last but not least: dataset in DASD box cache can any type you want, while Hiperbatch is limited to SAM and ESDS (AFAIR) organizations. Ron, can you provide some operational details, how-to do it? Should I define a volume in cache ? Can I tell the machine "this volume have to be whole in cache" ? -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
