>but it can be a challenge for workloads that
are set up to use velocity goals in a mixed environment.  Sometimes I've had to 
go against the "single image" concept of sysplex and set up different goals by 
lpar where I could. 

That does go against the intent of WLM, but ever since IBM allowed goals by 
SYSID, the architecture has been broken, in my mind (or what I laughingly call 
mine).

But, I've found, that ever since we included I/O in the velocity equation, that 
the CPU differences haven't had a big impact.

Of course, I have always used transaction goals where I can.

-
-teD

300,000 Kilometres per Second
Not only is it a good idea!
It's the LAW!!!  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to