On Thu, 25 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>So no one is confused by you choice of words ("we had"): That was a
>choice you made, not a requirement. It never was and still isn't
>required.
>
>IIRC, there was no option for goals of the region until 2.9 or 2.10.
>I was at a CMG Canada conference where somebody mentioned that it was now
available.
>I seem to remember that prior to that only transaction based goals were
available.
>And, if you didn't specify any, you got the default you coded, or
discretionary if you didn't.
>
>This was a stumbling block for us in January 1999.
>
>(But, I have been wrong before. And, a lot has happend in 7.5 years).
>
>-
OS/390 2.10. You are confusing the ability to have some CICS regions
(usually test) managed by velocity goals and some by response
goals. Prior to that it was all or none by response goals. Since
that time you can have all, some, or none managed by velocity goals.
Response goals have some extra overhead because of how often WLM
samples CICS PBs (performance blocks). MAXTASKS being too high will
just aggrevate this issue.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
