>Ted, You said that you lose 12-15% when you add the second engine and another >15% or more for each additional engine that you add.
I said for up to a certain size and I was quoting from (poor) memory. >Here you present a 30% reduction for the ninth CP compared to the first. Based on LSPR, ISV charges and other sources. It is an additional 306 MIPS, only. >Your math doesn't add up. If it was 15% per CP, your ninth one would be more >like 110 MIPS. The data that you've presented suggests more like 5% per added >CP. I don't understand the above statement. All I was trying to point out was the SMP effect is alive and well. - -teD 300,000 Kilometres per Second Not only is it a good idea! It's the LAW!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
