I'll ask "Why to you care?" and suggest try it and see :)
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Programmer (509) 335-7359 Information Technology Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-1222 > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Charles Mills > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 10:40 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Track capacity? > > THANK YOU. > > Charles > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf > Of Schwarz, Barry A > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 10:32 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Track capacity? > > > Quickref has it (item 3390DASD). I would expect it is available on the > IBM web site but I don't have very much luck when I use their search > feature. > > A blocksize of 605 will result in 45 blocks per track which results in > slightly less than 50% utilization. Your primary is 104 tracks and your > secondary is 13 tracks. > > 121 byte blocks result in 75 blocks per track > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
