No problems with Attachmate for us after we got on the current release. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/06 9:02 AM >>> Daniel A. McLaughlin wrote:
> Good day. We're trying to hook into OSA-ICC with Attachmate, and it's not > an elegant solution. It makes me wonder about products like PCOMM and > AF/Remote for that process instead of Attachmate. > > Have any of you opted for either of the latter two over Attachmate? If so, > what was your justification? We're licensed for Attachamte, and we have an > old copy of AF/Remote which we are looking at upgrading for this project. > In the meantime, we've been at this for days, our primary problem being > that we can't get the PC running Attachmate to come up as a NIP console. > > One last thought. If IBM is asking us to replace 2074s and 3174s with this > new and improved OSAC-ICC solution, will PCOMM become a free product if it > isn't already? Just wondering..... =========================================================================== "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
