On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:22:41 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark Zelden wrote: >> While the code path may be virtually the exact same in z/OS 1.8 >> with the new support as the TRAP in prior versions, "supported" means >> that I would have been able to specify TRAPS NAME(IgvNoUserKeyCSA) on >> any release since OS/390 R6 up to z/OS 1.8 (while the OS was still >> supported) and IBM would debug / APAR any problem I had by specifying it. >> I don't think that is the case. >> > >Huh???! If you discover and report a user key CSA allocation in IBM >code, they *will* take an APAR because it represents a potential >integrity exposure. The issue is not which tool you use to find the >exposure. The issue is the exposure itself!! > Ed, I was not referring to a problem discovered by the specification (user key CSA), I was referring to any other (IBM) problem caused by using an undocumented / unsupported traps in DIAGxx. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
