maybe it's some sysprog that initially started the rumor because sysprogs
are getting tired of hearing about
cobol II and vs cobol?
let's see "LE/COBOL" has been available for what 15 years now, it's time to
bite the bullet and get off of
cobol II and vs cobol
period. end of comment.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:57 PM
Subject: In search of (false) rumor source
I am curious if anyone can help me track down WHY so many sites are getting
the wrong information about z/OS LE V1R7 (or any release) NOT supporting
OS/VS COBOL and VS COBOL II compiled object code.
Is this some presentation somewhere? Some IBM or other document?
Something
being said by some IBM-ers? Just "rumors" that are getting passed along?
Other?
P.S. Is it possible that this is getting confused with the CICS TS V3.1
drop of support for OS/VS COBOL (not VS COBOL II) object code?
Any pointers (especially to web-sites with the mis-information) would be
appreciated. (Feel free to reply on the list - or by private email to:
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
