Whatever their site is I'm deeply envious of how comprehensive its contents are. The design must be such that:
1. It's readily update-able. 2. It's readily search-able, in that a reference to the 1978 version of the ABC Frammis get quoted rather instantly. 3. Seeming non-redundant, though I must admit I only read a few additional peripheral links. Anyway, it impresses me....... tb -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 12:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Are posts from Annie and Leon Wheeler a bot or something? Gee, in one of his replies to Phil Payne, he mentions "one of your articles" and links to the Isham Research web site. Seems human enough to me. If it's a bot, it's good enough to pass a Turing test. Jon <snip> However Anne or Lynn could answer us & confirm or deny. Lynn ? Can you answer us, please ? </snip> He also is not insulting or demeaning to other posters. I'll take that. <snip> What is good Lynn never answers "no, you're wrong, I know it" or fight for the only proper meaning of USS acronym <g> </snip> ------------------------------------------------------- --------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
