Jan, <snip> Site-2 the recovery site with the PPRC-ed disks & with the controlling K-sys (The advantage of this is that the Controlling system will continue to be available even if a disaster takes down the whole production site.). <snip>
I would say you also need alternate couple datasets to be in the site-2 if you want your K-sys to survive a failure in the site-1. <snip> Q2. We are not that sure at all that we are able to keep our (production) structures at the site-1 CFs with PREFLIST & ENFORCEORDER(YES). For example, what happens with a duplexed structure (at production Site-1) when one of the site-1 CFs goes down? <snip> I have no experience with this, we had got rid of the third CF long before structure duplexing was available. But maybe an assymetrical connectivity could solve your problems: If you don't go to use the site-2 CF in the production with systems running in the site-1, you could connect it to site-2 only (k-system and backup systems). In that case only the structures used by k-system running alone could be allocated / rebuilded into site-2 CF. (Well, that is a theory. I've not seen it in praxis.) Zaromil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
