> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:23 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: COBOL Compiler APF > > > Why does the compiler have to be APF'd? > That's the way I have seen it at every shop I have worked at. > > (PS: RIM is screwing up my account(s), so check the REPLYTO > before you reply to) > > When in doubt. > PANIC!!
Sure as blazes isn't APF auth'ed here! And reply-to is still to your account, not IBM-MAIN <shrug> -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
