Rick QTAM, the "access method" that expected incoming messages to be tagged with the date and time on being received by the QTAM layer and to be tagged with the time when sent by the QTAM layer. As the poor instructor was covering this point, a very rude student - no prizes - pointed out that, with the reputation QTAM had for performance, surely the date should be included also as the message was sent.
Chris Mason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Fochtman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> Sent: Tuesday, 10 October, 2006 11:55 PM Subject: Re: What's a programming language > ... > I don't think anyone misses ISAM any more than they miss QTAM. My > biggest fear is that BSAM, QSAM, BPAM and BDAM will follow. > > Have any of you old-timers notices that MQM's store-and-forward seems a > lot like the old TCAM queueing and forwarding capaility? Or am I just > imagining it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
