On 11 Oct 2006 14:51:15 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Darren Evans-Young) wrote:
Absence or presence of REPLY-TO affects differently
those of us who read the list via USENET. If there's no
REPLY-TO, TO is the munged e-mail address of the
sender. Occasionally, someone posts with a REPLY-TO of the
list, and that makes things easier. However, when someone
has a REPLY-TO of their own address, I tend to think it was
just a mistake in the munging (as occasionally happens) and
change it to the list, anyway.
I guess I need to read the newsgroup more often. I wasn't
aware there was a problem with the munging.
Here's part of an e-mail I sent you at the end of
June. Perhaps it didn't get through. Since this will be
mirrored to Usenet, I've munged the unmunged address.
More importantly, though, on at least some of the
echoed posts, the e-mail addresses aren't getting
munged. For instance:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
shows "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R.S.)"
A half hour later, the same poster's edress is properly munged:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R.S.)"
--
I cannot receive mail at the address this was sent from.
To reply directly, send to ar23hur "at" intergate "dot" com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
