Unicode conversion. IBM is big on that. (Yes, a second cousin of Kanji.)
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk Talman Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 1:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Effi[ci]ency of branch table vs individual compare & branch I had not heard of the TRTO and had to resort to rtfm. My head is spinning. Why would anyone ever want to use a 64 K(i?)B translate table that has to be on a page boundary (in some cases) unless one is compressing data or converting Kanji and its first cousins to SBCS? What could it ever gain one? What am I missing? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
