> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 7:22 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: S0C1 with ILC 6
<snip> > > What's wrong with the ABEND macro? Preferably preceded by a WTO with > ROUTCDE=11. > > -- > Tom Marchant I'm too lazy??? <GRIN> Actually, I only have one program in production which does this. The reason I do it, is because the program is called both in batch and CICS. I cannot return a "failed" indication to the caller because that is not part of the "architected" interface (which was in place before I rewrote the code). But I cannot just return "junk" to the caller with no indication of a failure. So I decided to abend. But how to __easily__ do that in both batch and CICS? The S0C3 works, and is very infrequent, and cannot be missed by the programmers (it drives them nuts). -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
