On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:35:59 -0600, Tom Schmidt wrote: >On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 06:48:46 -0600, Len Rugen wrote: >>I think I missed something, WHY does the Cicso CIP need to be replaced?
... >>So, if the CISCO CIP is going away or someting, I may need to "onload" >>myself. (Sounds like a buffet....) > >I believe the OP was being driven by announcement material from Cisco; >bottom line is that it appears as if the CIP end of life is soon for many >Cisco boxen (and has already passed for many others). The OP's site has >requirements that all software (and hardware) be currently supported by the >various vendors... and Cisco's announcements meant that it was time to move >along. Cisco's web page: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2033/prod_eol_notice0900aec d80393aa5.html or: http://tinyurl.com/d8fvx >From that web page: "Product Migration Options "There is no replacement product at this time. This will mark the last ESCON mainframe channel attachment marketed by Cisco. Customers are encouraged to explore other attachment methods with their Cisco account team." -- Tom Schmidt Madison, WI ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
