In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/31/2007 at 07:45 PM, VĂctor de la Fuente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I am a newbie on Server Pac, and I read a lot of documentation >related to Server Pac; I was trying to get a good approach. One of >the things I read (I think it was on Planning for Installation book) >was related to catalogs. The recommendation was having one or more >disks for Target Libraries, one or more for Distribution Libraries, >one for MCAT and some operational data sets, one for HFS >Target,...and so on. There was also a recommendation about having a >UCAT on each of these disks; I mean, one UCAT for Target LIBs, one >for DLIBs, one for HFS Target,... Are you sure that you read it right? >Could you give me some clues to solve this quiz? My recommendation would be to organize user catalogs functionally, not based on particular disks. I wouldn't put any operational data sets on dlib or target volumes, especially not catalogs. I'd use indirect and extended indirect cataloging for dlib and target data sets. For *FS data sets I'd use a naming convention that prevented duplicate names. I'd include volume serial numbers in the DDDEF's. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html