In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
01/31/2007
at 07:45 PM, Víctor de la Fuente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I am a newbie on Server Pac, and I read a lot of documentation
>related to Server Pac; I was trying to get a good approach. One of
>the things I read (I think it was on Planning for Installation book)
>was related to catalogs. The recommendation was having one or more
>disks for Target Libraries, one or more for Distribution Libraries,
>one for MCAT and some operational data sets, one for HFS
>Target,...and so on. There was also a recommendation about having a
>UCAT on each of these disks; I mean, one UCAT for Target LIBs, one
>for DLIBs, one for HFS Target,...
Are you sure that you read it right?
>Could you give me some clues to solve this quiz?
My recommendation would be to organize user catalogs functionally, not
based on particular disks. I wouldn't put any operational data sets on
dlib or target volumes, especially not catalogs. I'd use indirect and
extended indirect cataloging for dlib and target data sets. For *FS
data sets I'd use a naming convention that prevented duplicate names.
I'd include volume serial numbers in the DDDEF's.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
