I was called to task for venturing an opinion without substantiating it. This was a reasonable criticism so here are some of my reasons for my TMS preference.
RMM con: RMM lack of retained customer fields, eg vendor id Lack of ?inq? function ? ease of clist mitigates somewhat Lack of report writer ? sort more cumbersome Different rmm states can make scratching and init tape a pblm IBM tries to change std, eg add accode leave out expdt More parochial perspective, eg product and owner concept RMM Storage location/shelves more confusing than tms vaulting Less knowledge base in the industry Problem support has gotten "better" RMM pro: Include with os Better planned maintenance Better doc?m Lots of sort support Clist variable support Quicker os and tape drive support TMS pro: Stability & functionality of age Since it was the only/best game in town for so long, it?s the standard ?better? reporting (arguably) Good problem support TMS con: Yet another product to add. Usually another smp zone ?slight? lag in new products ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
