In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/19/2007
at 08:52 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>But the distribution list for such warnings might ideally include
>Accounts Payable personnel who can't even spell "TSO".
The messages from others suggest that what is needed is a message to
someone to lean on A-P, rather than a message to A-P.
>Electronic communication should be regarded as a utility, like
>telephone service, where interoperation is essential. If the
>multitude of cellular telephone services can (mostly) interoperate
>with each other and with land-based providers, why can't the
>"standard" (a standard with only one participant?) TSO/E services
>interoperate with RFC *821/*822?
They can, if you set them up that way. It's not appropriate to do so
at every organization.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
