On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:38:59 -0600, Mark H. Young
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:24:09 -0600, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>>Unless there's some sort of DB2 database voodoo incantation that needs to
>>>be performed?!
>>>
>>
>>There is.  Check out the INITPARM options for the DB2 subsystem.  Same
>>is true with RACF - it will only register with the correct parm.
>>
>
>Well I had said it's defined in SYS1.PARMLIB in IEFSSNxx, and INITPARM is
>one of the parms for that definition. If that's what you're talking about,
>then it's there. I was thinking it might ALSO have to be defined 'within'
>the DB2 definitions and/or RACF defs somewhere, OTHER than IEFSSNxx.
>

I know you already have an INITPARM for DB2. I was gently hinting that
your INITPARM options might need to be changed. You need to read the
fine manual to chose the option that fits your environment.  

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group:  G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to