On 1 Mar 2007 11:31:12 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>On Mar 1, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
>
>> -----------------------<snip>---------------------
>> A friend made a very good point that many sysprogs lost their jobs  
>> in OZ due to outsourcing; like one company had 8 SP, then  
>> outsourced, & eventually ended up with 2 SP supporting a few sites.
>>
>> Has this also been a factor in US?
>> -----------------------<unsnip>-------------------
>> It's a factor, but I'm not sure how great a factor.
>------------SNIP------------------------------------
>
>The one place I was familiar with(7+ years ago). I heard they have  
>outsourced  to India. Supposedly all their systems staff is being let  
>go and will be supported out of India. It is too early in the process  
>to know if it will work or not, IMO. My gut instinct is that it will  
>not work but I am not in any real position to know. I suspect that  
>the positions here will be around (although numbers will be smaller)  
>for some time. What I am really curious about when it falls flat on  
>its face.
>
>Ed
>
Outsourcing means giving up some control.  The legal implications and
responsibilities when something goes wrong should be the subject of
careful negotiation.  When the entities are in two different states
(United State of America, India or Germany for example) or provinces
(Canada for example), the legal issues become somewhat more complex.
When the entities are in two different countries, the complications
escalate.  The Patriot Act in the United States has some Canadians
worried about privacy violations (probably correctly) and this concern
led to people opposing the outsourcing of some government processing
(health care) in British Columbia to a US based company.  Outsourcing
within the North American Free Trade Act area or within the European
Union is probably less risky than between the two entities.  My rule
of thumb would be "don't outsource to a jurisdiction where the company
doing the outsourcing doesn't have a strong physical presence".  The
strong physical presence gives greater assurance that the company
knows local laws and customs (greater, not absolute).  

The thing that has baffled me about outsourcing is how do companies
actually save money since now the outsourcer includes in its costs
marketing expenses and profits.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to