In a recent note, Shane Ginnane said: > Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:03:58 +1000 > > In this, as in so many other things, it is SDSF that needs to be dragged > kicking and screaming out of its own little cocoon. > Fell free to flick a request their way. > It'll be ignored. > Thanks for the encouragement and redirection. PMR submitted on SDSF (I believe that's the proper form for a "request" that erroneous behavior be repaired).
I guess we'll find out how quickly they can reply "WAD". But at least once before, SDSF gave me WAD (on a behavior less clearly erroneous than this -- performance), only to repair it _sua_sponte_ in a (much) later elease. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
