Was that the exec that defined the consoles to CICS? I remember IEE899I being automated for console message backups also. I'll drop them a note.
Mark > > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:38:15 -0500 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrick_O'Keefe?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Who uses IEE899I for Automation? > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:09:02 -0400, John Eells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I "automated" the response to D C for a while at my previous shop. I > don't > remember if that was still the case when I left. If so, that automation > is probably still in effect. > > This was not strictly "message automation". I issued a D C command from > NetView and processed whatever response was correlated with the command. > I doubt I checked the message ID. > > I doubt the people in the company that absorbed my old shop know this > automation is in place (if it IS still in place), and it will be tricky > for them to find. Searching for IEE889I will probably do no good even > if they are alerted to do so by HOLD AO data. > > > Pat O'Keefe > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
